Vinashin’s financial wrongdoings must be under tight scrutiny, according to deputies Le Van Cuong from central Thanh Hoa Province.
Vinashin, which was an state-owned economic group, must be under management by the Government and relevant ministries, Cuong said.
The oversight governance led the shipbuilding group on the brink of bankruptcy were unacceptable.
People urged the National Assembly to take tough measures to scrutinize Vinashin’s financial woes.
Many deputies said that the Government’s report on the case was not specific. What’s your opinion?
The report blamed the policy the central and the group's leaders’ poor man agent. The Government took responsibility for the case in general. Why did the Government and relevant ministries hear the group’s reports without direct monitoring.
Must be managed with the regulations, given their property rights so that large institutions do not prescribe the management, supervision is not enough to accomplish their tasks.
It could not blame the management mechanism for Vinashin’s financial wrongdoings
Who would take responsibility to Vinashin’s debts?
Ministers appointed to the group's leaders that like the prime minister must take responsibility. If the Prime Minister was busy, not managing it all, there must be management unit responsible. If the Prime Minister assigned to the department that did not complete the task that the minister responsible.
Now we are promoting individual responsibility but Prime Minister said only government responsibility.
It is too general, the Government has more than 20 position, there are not relevant to the management of Vinashin. If they vote to pass the problem of Vinashin, then they are responsible, if not to say they are responsible, it is difficult to convince.
Government must demonstrate collective responsibility how. When it comes to take responsibility, in my opinion, should be accompanied receive discipline, can not say in general because this is a big problem, people hear that they found no convincing hard to accept.
The report stated that Vinashin CEO Pham Thanh Binh, who held several key positions in the group. Vinashin had delayed the wrongdoings. It is reasonable?
In principle, we always have to understand individuals whose power is difficult to voluntarily divest their power. How the deputy would dare to ask the leader to step down. It came very sensitive issue.
Organizations that did not create a monitoring mechanism, to concentrate power in the hands of a person is born authoritarian, patriarchal is difficult to avoid
The inspection reports of the ministries, branches, according to Inspector General Tran Van Truyen, also detected but Vinashin had not done.
Government inspectors twice proposed inspection is not. Said the economic crisis, but people that have expressed cover. Need to explain, clarify. I think the sense of responsibility is also too simple.
It’s right to say it should not operate when depending on reports only?
Vinashin’s false financial reports were true. Not only have I found the fact that Vinashin many places, people love to report how the reporting mechanism on inspection and also often lack information on the report.
Through this incident demonstrates the bureaucratic management, is still not realistic.
No comments:
Post a Comment